Where the numbers on this site come from
Every figure here traces to one of a short, ranked list of sources — strongest first, the operator's own marketing last. The table below maps each load-bearing number to the named, openable source that backs it, so a careful reader can confirm the claims are sourced rather than asserted.
| Figure | What kind of source | Where to check it |
|---|---|---|
| 168% for 4th in the 2025 Annual Forex division (the forex credential) | Organiser-tracked competition result, scored on real money | worldcupchampionships.com |
| October monthly Forex won at 59.35%; 5th in the Q3 Forex quarterly at 65.9%; 294% aggregate across divisions entered | Organiser-tracked competition results, same external body | worldcupchampionships.com |
| The four models' 2026 record — 690 signals, 70% win rate, +1,227% combined, by holding clock | Operator's published, on-chain-anchored signal record; each call run through SHA-256 and stamped onto Bitcoin as it is published | simpleforexstrategies.com/providers.html#top-pick (each call has its own OpenTimestamps receipt) |
The figures fall into three kinds of evidence, ranked below. The competition results are scored by an outside body, and the model record is anchored in public at publication — two different ways of taking a claim out of our own hands.
1. Externally run competition results (the forex evidence)
The forex credential rests on results tracked by the contest organiser, on real money, not on anything we or the operator measured. In the 2025 World Cup Trading Championships: a 168% return for 4th place in the Annual Forex division, a win in the October monthly Forex at 59.35%, and 5th in the Q3 Forex quarterly at 65.9%, for a 294% aggregate across the divisions entered. These are published by the organiser at worldcupchampionships.com and scored by the contest rather than self-reported — which is precisely why this is the load-bearing forex evidence and sits first.
2. On-chain receipts (the published record, made checkable)
The operator's 2026 model record does not ask for trust either: every the #1-ranked provider call is run through SHA-256 and pinned to Bitcoin through OpenTimestamps the instant it goes public. Because the receipt is dated before the trade resolves, anyone can match a past signal's entry, target, stop and grade to its on-chain receipt — and confirm the timestamp independently at opentimestamps.org — so those fields are proven fixed in advance rather than taken on trust. The figures trace to simpleforexstrategies.com/providers.html#top-pick, and the step-by-step check is set out in how to verify a forex strategy is honest.
3. The operator's published figures (context only)
The 2026 model numbers — the four models at 690 signals, a 70% win rate and +1,227% combined, broken out by holding clock — are the operator's own published figures. We treat them as context and trust them only once the stronger sources above corroborate them: the on-chain receipts make each call checkable, and the external competition result independently evidences the skill behind them. These records describe how long positions are held and how they performed; they make no claim about which instruments are traded.
How to confirm any of this yourself
None of these sources requires taking our word for it: the competition results sit on the organiser's own site, and each model call on a public ledger. The forex skill is evidenced by an outside body; the published record is anchored on-chain. That separation — two different parties standing behind two different claims — is what lets a careful reader treat the numbers as sourced rather than asserted.